Comments on: Clinton: No Interest in White House. (Pope: Not Catholic)

By: fuster

fuster — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:11:54 +0000

Thanks for the explanation. I shouldn’t have needed it.

By: CK MacLeod

CK MacLeod — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:00:38 +0000

Aren’t they self-explanatory? If you tick the first box when you post, you will “subscribe” to the thread – get e-mails alerting you to and showing you any replies on the thread. If you’d like to keep up with the discussion but don’t care to post, you can use the second option below. If, after subscribing you change your mind, you can use a link that appears below the comment box to manage your subscriptions – to the particular thread and to any other threads – giving you the option to remove any or all of them.

By: fuster

fuster — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:24:38 +0000

Would you care to explain the uses of the thingas?

By: CK MacLeod

CK MacLeod — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:15:00 +0000

I’m generally good for testing people’s patience.

That you are, cluck, that you are. We’re testing out a thingamajig and in addition a thingamabob – the comment subscriptions forms you should now be seeing below the comment form. Feel free to employ and try to break it. If it’s anyway weirdin you out, lemme know.

By: J.E. Dyer

J.E. Dyer — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:26:38 +0000

Test SAT

Thanks, folks!

By: CK MacLeod

CK MacLeod — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:24:13 +0000

Um… is that a good test or a bad test, JED?

By: fuster

fuster — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:22:19 +0000

I’m generally good for testing people’s patience.

By: J.E. Dyer

J.E. Dyer — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:19:24 +0000

Test — general request for someone to comment… gobbledegook fine… Test

By: Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:14:43 +0000

Nice angry, rabid chipmunk photo but what does that have to do with Hillary Clinton?

She munches on them as a snack.

By: nokarmahere

nokarmahere — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:15:21 +0000

Nice angry, rabid chipmunk photo but what does that have to do with Hillary Clinton?