When I was a kid, the barbershop I went to every other week for a haircut had a sign on the wall reading “If You Leave, You Lose Your Turn.” (Some years later, when my brother began practice as a clinical psychologist, I recommended that he hang a sign in his office advising his patients “If You Leave, You Lose Your Mind.”)
This simple sign from long ago came to mind this morning as I was (1) reviewing the latest round of opinions on the health care debate and (2) reflecting on something Stephen Hayes said last night during the panel segment of Special Report with Bret Baier. Let’s take Hayes first.
Hayes noted, correctly I believe, that the town-hall protests this past week had the unintended consequence of helping the Democrats and the administration by enabling them to change the subject from Obamacare with its many fatal flaws to the unseemly conduct of the protests. Co-panelist Charles Krauthammer elaborated on this point by observing that the protesters missed an important opportunity to address these flaws calmly and dismissively in a point-by-point fashion. In short, the protesters — and in a larger sense, Republicans — “lost their turn.”
Luckily, it is not too late for Republicans to change the subject back — to get another turn. Obamacare is still very much on the ropes, primarily because of the “Death Panel” clause (to borrow a well-placed phrase) it contains.
This becomes evident when you examine opinions emanating this morning from the left. Lee Siegel, who identifies himself as “among those . . . who believe that the absence of universal health care is America’s burning shame,” writes in the Daily Beast that “One of the key bills under consideration in the plan — sympathy for limitations on end-of-life care — is morally revolting.” Siegel later dispassionately dissects Obama’s curious embrace of “a utilitarian initiative straight out of Victorian England” as arising from his University of Chicago Law School days, where one of the leading voices on the faculty, Judge Richard Posner, “is both an enthusiastic advocate of euthanasia and an energetic eugenicist.”
Eugene Robinson, hardly the voice of reason, writes in the Washington Post that among the the “nut jobs and carpetbaggers” protesting at town halls are “confused and concerned Americans who seem genuinely convinced they’re not being told the whole truth about health care reform,” adding “And they have a point.”
Even the New York Times (aka, the White House East) has a piece this morning on the launch of a new administration website (yet another website!) to counter “potentially damaging charges,” noting that the need for such a site acknowledges the reality Obama is “suddenly at risk of losing control of the public debate.”
As to Republicans having lost their turn — and their rational voice — initially, the Democrats are now doing their level best to lose theirs. First, there was the “punch back twice as hard” remark emanating from the White House, which seems to have been construed literally at a town-hall protest in St. Louis last week. Added to this were provocative comments by Obama himself, who unwisely said at a rally for Creigh Deeds, Virginia’s Democratic nominee for governor,
I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don’t mind cleanin’ up after them, but don’t do a lot of talkin’. [Video here.]
The Democrat counter-initiative (dubbed “Operation Shoot Self in Foot”), continued yesterday with the tag team of Hoyer and Pelosi calling the protesters “un-American” in a USA Today article, thereby having forgotten their credo from a year ago that dissent is the highest form of patriotism.
We have a long way to go, of course, before the dust settles on the health care debate, but right now this is shaping up to be one long, hot August for the Democrats. Republicans meantime would be well-served to heed a piece of timely advice: When your enemy is committing suicide, get out of his way.


Comments 4
I caught the Fox panel you refer to, and felt that Dr K was stronger on the “lost turn” point than Hayes. I found it unconvincing – especially in Dr K’s final comments suggesting that the supposed excesses of the opposition would give shaky legislators an “excuse” to vote for the bill, those against it merely having been a bunch of crazy people. If there was any reason to believe that the “crazy people” didn’t represent the views of a majority of voters, and if the bill wasn’t such a huge initiative, I might agree with Dr. K.
I suspect that most here will side with him over Dick Morris on almost any subject, but I tend to agree with comments Morris made a bit later on Fox, apparently referring directly to the Krauthammer statements, characterizing them as “nonsense.” Morris believed that, given the Dem majorities in Congress and the arm-twisting to be applied back in DC in September and the importance of the bill to the entire Democratic coalition but especially its leadership, the main chance for defeating it rested on red state Dems being terrified.
August 11th, 2009 at 11:50 am
Colin, I should have made that point the Dr K has said the same thing Hayes did on a previous show, which is where I recall the “excuse” comment as having been made (though I seem to recall Krauthammer saying it would not be an excuse Dems could use.)
In any case, I see the protests and the hub-bub that surround them as a temporary blip. Everyone seems to have their horror story where Obamacare is concerned. Even Obama fan Ed Koch (my next least favorite mayor of NYC after David Dinkins) wrote at RCP today that he is concerned about losing his gold-plated coverage were the current bill to be passed. Ultimately, a lesser type of “reform,” if it can be called that, will pass, though TGL will call it a “resounding victory.”
August 11th, 2009 at 12:00 pm
Phew – I thought we were going to get into a fight – over whether it should be “protestEr” or “protestOr.”
Our recollections differ on what Dr K said. I remember being struck with how excessive it was – reminding me of what I consider to be a weakness of his for rhetorical melodrama – but I was multi-tasking at the time, so maybe I misheard. Maybe the Corner will print one of its transcripts today.
August 11th, 2009 at 12:08 pm
No need, your Czarship. I defer. My memory she ain’t so good nowadays.
“When asked to decline, I always decline.”
August 11th, 2009 at 12:28 pm